Skip to content

T18 reasoning: Theosis vocabulary

Reasoning steps: Theosis vocabulary

Verdicts: T18 · Theosis vocabulary. Method: conventions, scoring and proximity eras. Scripture is the primary measure; fathers are weighed by era (Era I to c. 150 = 1.0, II = 0.8, III = 0.6, IV = 0.4).

T18.1: Theosis vocabulary

Step T18.1.1: Scripture

2 Pet 1:4: ‘partakers of the divine nature’; 2 Cor 3:18 (’transformed into the same image’); 1 John 3:2 (‘we shall be like him’). No text uses θέωσις, and creature–Creator distinction is maintained.

Step T18.1.2: Patristic evidence

Irenaeus (Era II): Christ ‘did … become what we are, that He might bring us to be even what He is Himself’. Athanasius (Era III): ‘He was made man that we might be made God’. Sources: irenaeus-t18-s1 · athanasius-t18-s1.

Step T18.1.3: Weighing decision

Deification language is Era II onward and widespread, always by grace and without confusing creature and Creator. Verdict: consensus vocabulary from Era II.

  • Confidence: High.

Step T18.1.4: Source-proximity weighing

  • Scripture (benchmark): 2 Pet 1:4 speaks of sharing the divine nature; the vocabulary is an interpretation of this and of transformation into Christ’s image. (Scripture confidence: medium)
  • Assessment: Era II and Scripture support the idea; the specific vocabulary is post-biblical.

T18.2: Is God known by his operations but not in his essence?

Step T18.2.1: Scripture

John 1:18; 1 Tim 6:16 (‘unapproachable light’); Rom 1:20 (‘his invisible attributes … clearly perceived’); 2 Pet 1:4.

Step T18.2.2: Patristic evidence

Basil (Era III, Letter 234): ‘The operations are various, and the essence simple, but we say that we know our God from His operations, but do not undertake to approach near to His essence’. Sources: basil-t18-s1.

Step T18.2.3: Weighing decision

Scripture and Basil agree that God is known in his works and not comprehended in his being. The Palamite real distinction is a post-750 development. Verdict: consensus on the epistemic point; the metaphysical distinction is later.

  • Confidence: Medium-high.

Step T18.2.4: Source-proximity weighing

  • Scripture (benchmark): 1 Tim 6:16; Rom 1:20. (Scripture confidence: medium)
  • Assessment: All nine affirm incomprehensibility; the dispute is metaphysical.

Post-750 development by tradition

Catholic

See the note below.

  • T18.1 (fathers 3/4; Scripture 3/4): Used (Aquinas; Catechism tradition), not central in Trent.
  • T18.2 (fathers 4/4; Scripture 4/4): Incomprehensibility (e.g. WCF II.1 ‘incomprehensible’).

Orthodox

See the note below.

  • T18.1 (fathers 4/4; Scripture 3/4): Central (Palamas).
  • T18.2 (fathers n/a; Scripture n/a): Not assessed: the 1351 Synodal Tome was not checked.

Oriental Orthodox

See the note below.

  • T18.1 (fathers 2/4; Scripture 3/4): Shenouda III, Man’s Deification!! part 1: on 2 Pet 1:4, ‘The apostle’s words mean that we take part with the Divine Nature in work, in will, and in edification of God’s Kingdom, not that we take the Divine nature’ (verified, PDF of the English edition); he calls ‘man’s deification’ a heresy
  • T18.2 (fathers 4/4; Scripture 4/4): Incomprehensibility (e.g. WCF II.1 ‘incomprehensible’).

Lutheran

See the note below.

  • T18.1 (fathers 2/4; Scripture 3/4): Union with Christ; deification language rare in the confessions.
  • T18.2 (fathers 4/4; Scripture 4/4): Incomprehensibility (e.g. WCF II.1 ‘incomprehensible’).

Anglican

See the note below.

  • T18.1 (fathers 2/4; Scripture 3/4): Not used in the Articles.
  • T18.2 (fathers 4/4; Scripture 4/4): Incomprehensibility (e.g. WCF II.1 ‘incomprehensible’).

Presbyterian

See the note below.

  • T18.1 (fathers 2/4; Scripture 3/4): Union with Christ (WCF XXVI); no deification language.
  • T18.2 (fathers 4/4; Scripture 4/4): Incomprehensibility (e.g. WCF II.1 ‘incomprehensible’).

Reformed Baptist

See the note below.

  • T18.1 (fathers 2/4; Scripture 3/4): Union with Christ (1689 27).
  • T18.2 (fathers 4/4; Scripture 4/4): Incomprehensibility (e.g. WCF II.1 ‘incomprehensible’).

General Baptist

See the note below.

  • T18.1 (fathers 2/4; Scripture 3/4): Not used.
  • T18.2 (fathers 4/4; Scripture 4/4): Incomprehensibility (e.g. WCF II.1 ‘incomprehensible’).

Anabaptist

See the note below.

  • T18.1 (fathers n/a; Scripture n/a): Not assessed: Menno’s wording was not checked.
  • T18.2 (fathers 4/4; Scripture 4/4): Incomprehensibility (e.g. WCF II.1 ‘incomprehensible’).